Beveridge believes that occupying the Philippines would help make the United States a world power, while Carnegie thinks it would leave the United States open to attack. … The United States has brought peace and liberty to the Philippines.
Why does Beveridge believe the US should annex the Philippines?
Beveridge also argues that the United States would benefit due to the strategic location of the Philippines, it being in the Pacific and near to China, as well as its rich resources. Beveridge sees the annexation of the Philippines as an obligation of the American people.
Why should the US annex Philippines?
Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.
Did Beveridge support US annexation of the Philippines?
Beveridge is known as one of the most prominent American imperialists. He supported the annexation of the Philippines and, along with Republican leader Henry Cabot Lodge, campaigned for the construction of a new navy.
What does Albert Beveridge think of the people of the Philippines?
Senator Beveridge’s speech on the Philippines reflects an era of American imperialism in the Pacific. … The Philippines are ours forever, “territory belonging to the United States,” as the Constitution calls them. And just beyond the Philippines are China’s illimitable markets. We will not retreat from either.
Why the United States should not annex the Philippines?
The United States shouldn’t have annexed the Philippines because they did it mainly to demonstrate that it was a superior country, they didn’t have the right to judge whether or not the Philippines were capable of self-government and lastly it went against the image the country wanted to uphold as a just and civilized …
What is the most important reason to not support annexation of the Philippines?
Those who favored annexation claimed the Filipinos were incapable of self rule and needed the leadership of the United States, a nation of order and progress. Additionally, they feared that if the United States did not annex the Philippines, Japan or Germany might.
Was annexing the Philippines a good idea?
Some thought has been given to the pros and cons of annexing the Philippines back into the United States. It could reinforce American interests in the region, reduce crime on the islands, and support a more democratic government.
What did America gain from the Philippines?
The Treaty of Paris was signed on December 10, 1898. By the Treaty, Cuba gained its independence and Spain ceded the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico to the United States for the sum of US$20 million.
Did the US annex the Philippines?
By mid-August, Filipino rebels and U.S. troops had ousted the Spanish, but Aguinaldo’s hopes for independence were dashed when the United States formally annexed the Philippines as part of its peace treaty with Spain.
What territory does Beveridge state belongs to the US?
Beveridge speaks about the territory that belongs to the US. He said that “Philippine is ours forever, territory belonging to the United States”. This speech of him has been reflected into an era of American imperialism in the Pacific.
What reasons does Mckinley give for keeping the Philippines?
Mckinley believed that the Philippines might fall to anarchy if left alone and could result in a war that the US could get sucked into. The results of this action caused the formation of the anti-imperialists league.
What is the main point of Albert Beveridge’s paper?
23–26. Students may answer that Beveridge’s primary motive for U.S. imperialism was economic profit and his justification was a racist belief in Anglo-Saxon supremacy. Students may cite as evidence his argument that American foreign policy should operate to enhance American economic interests.
How does Beveridge answer the charge?
How does beveridge answer the charge that governing people without consent is wrong. everidge said that some people were not capable of self-government. … He compares the with the people of the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.